<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can We Hear Ourselves When We Sing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2008/06/can-we-hear-ourselves-when-we-sing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2008/06/can-we-hear-ourselves-when-we-sing/</link>
	<description>Music, Singing and the Creative Life of a Middle-Aged Diva</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:01:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2008/06/can-we-hear-ourselves-when-we-sing/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancyoutloud.com/?p=8#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Many arrows point to Nancy. Tonight I got an email from a friend of mine, jazzist Gerry Grosz, former winner of Best Song of the Year at West Coast Songwriters. In his current newsletter he mentioned that he plays vibes on a new album by Elaine Lucia. Now, I&#039;d heard bood things about her before, so I thought I should check out her sounds. Sure enough, great vocalist. On the sidebar, under the heading &quot;blogroll&quot; I see a link to -- that&#039;s right -- Nancy Tierney. Following it to this site, I see your list of musical preferences, including Dusty Springfield. Of course, Kate and I were just talking this morning about the incredible recording &quot;The Look Of Love&quot;, one of my all time favorites, by the incomparable DS. We have never spoken of our mutual admiration for her before!&lt;br /&gt;
Kenny&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many arrows point to Nancy. Tonight I got an email from a friend of mine, jazzist Gerry Grosz, former winner of Best Song of the Year at West Coast Songwriters. In his current newsletter he mentioned that he plays vibes on a new album by Elaine Lucia. Now, I&#8217;d heard bood things about her before, so I thought I should check out her sounds. Sure enough, great vocalist. On the sidebar, under the heading &#8220;blogroll&#8221; I see a link to &#8212; that&#8217;s right &#8212; Nancy Tierney. Following it to this site, I see your list of musical preferences, including Dusty Springfield. Of course, Kate and I were just talking this morning about the incredible recording &#8220;The Look Of Love&#8221;, one of my all time favorites, by the incomparable DS. We have never spoken of our mutual admiration for her before!<br />
Kenny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2008/06/can-we-hear-ourselves-when-we-sing/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancyoutloud.com/?p=8#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;As someone called upon to give (and get) song critiques...I find that what works is to be very specific, have a solution and have a positive comment about some aspect.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People do want to be told &quot;You&#039;re wonderful&quot; rather than &quot;You suck,&quot; that is, most would love the &quot;critique&quot; to be an all-out rave.  We need strokes.  However, they will listen to, &quot;It&#039;s great but you&#039;re dropping the consonants at the end of words&quot; or some other very specific criticism.  I liken it to telling a beautiful woman that she has a stray feather on her lovely evening gown.  Or telling a good friend they&#039;ve got spinach in their teeth.  They appreciate knowing.  If your commentary is solicited, specific and warm is the way to go.  In my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To me it&#039;s the asker&#039;s responsibility to let you know if what they really need is adulation.  And sometimes, that&#039;s all we want and need.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s also an asker&#039;s responsibility NOT to argue with someone giving a requested critique.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve got to take the negative critique like a man, even if you&#039;re a woman ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone called upon to give (and get) song critiques&#8230;I find that what works is to be very specific, have a solution and have a positive comment about some aspect.</p>
<p>People do want to be told &#8220;You&#8217;re wonderful&#8221; rather than &#8220;You suck,&#8221; that is, most would love the &#8220;critique&#8221; to be an all-out rave.  We need strokes.  However, they will listen to, &#8220;It&#8217;s great but you&#8217;re dropping the consonants at the end of words&#8221; or some other very specific criticism.  I liken it to telling a beautiful woman that she has a stray feather on her lovely evening gown.  Or telling a good friend they&#8217;ve got spinach in their teeth.  They appreciate knowing.  If your commentary is solicited, specific and warm is the way to go.  In my opinion.</p>
<p>To me it&#8217;s the asker&#8217;s responsibility to let you know if what they really need is adulation.  And sometimes, that&#8217;s all we want and need.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also an asker&#8217;s responsibility NOT to argue with someone giving a requested critique.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got to take the negative critique like a man, even if you&#8217;re a woman <img src='http://www.nancyoutloud.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2008/06/can-we-hear-ourselves-when-we-sing/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancyoutloud.com/?p=8#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nancy, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your first FaceBook fan here!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... &#039;psychotic voice teachers&#039;... now that&#039;s a bit of a generalization.  How many voice teachers have you had, and (out of the universe of voice teaching) what percentage of all voice teachers have you studied with?  So, I think, maybe it&#039;s not totally fair to put the rap on voice teachers.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And it is true, in my experience, that you can *never* hear your own voice &#039;objectively&#039;.  You are too close to the source of sound to judge, and even listening to yourself on recording is probably not &#039;objective&#039;.  I think singers *require* the reactions and comments of others to improve their voice.  N&#039;est-ce pas?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nancy, </p>
<p>Your first FaceBook fan here!</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; &#8216;psychotic voice teachers&#8217;&#8230; now that&#8217;s a bit of a generalization.  How many voice teachers have you had, and (out of the universe of voice teaching) what percentage of all voice teachers have you studied with?  So, I think, maybe it&#8217;s not totally fair to put the rap on voice teachers.  </p>
<p>And it is true, in my experience, that you can *never* hear your own voice &#8216;objectively&#8217;.  You are too close to the source of sound to judge, and even listening to yourself on recording is probably not &#8216;objective&#8217;.  I think singers *require* the reactions and comments of others to improve their voice.  N&#8217;est-ce pas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
