<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fragile Ego, Fragile Voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2009/09/fragile-ego-fragile-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2009/09/fragile-ego-fragile-voice/</link>
	<description>Music, Singing and the Creative Life of a Middle-Aged Diva</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2009/09/fragile-ego-fragile-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1185</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancyoutloud.com/?p=268#comment-1185</guid>
		<description>Well, well, well. 

Thank you, Chris. You summed it up perfectly. Damn, you&#039;re right!

I think where I get caught is when I admire the work of another and want to be a part of it somehow. It&#039;s a little like trying to sing a song you love even when it doesn&#039;t fit your voice. Often, I can let it go. Sometimes, I try to mutate myself in order to be able to sing it. Which never works.

I so appreciate your perspective (and your passion) around musical issues like this. You&#039;re one wise man. Thank you for being my friend. And my fan!

(I miss you both, too).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, well. </p>
<p>Thank you, Chris. You summed it up perfectly. Damn, you&#8217;re right!</p>
<p>I think where I get caught is when I admire the work of another and want to be a part of it somehow. It&#8217;s a little like trying to sing a song you love even when it doesn&#8217;t fit your voice. Often, I can let it go. Sometimes, I try to mutate myself in order to be able to sing it. Which never works.</p>
<p>I so appreciate your perspective (and your passion) around musical issues like this. You&#8217;re one wise man. Thank you for being my friend. And my fan!</p>
<p>(I miss you both, too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyoutloud.com/2009/09/fragile-ego-fragile-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nancyoutloud.com/?p=268#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>OK, I can&#039;t let this one go by.  As a singer (much more so than an instrumentalist would), you have a sound, *your* sound, and more particularly, *your wonderful* sound.  If someone wants to write something for *you* to sing, then that song needs to respect your wonderful sound.  None of this claptrap about your being &quot;not good enough&quot; to sing the song.  Whoever writes the song should be talented enough to create a song tailored to *your* gifts.

In the classical music world, concerti and arias are often written with a particular performer in mind - and, if a composer writes a work for a performer, that performer is not expected to shoehorn their way of playing or singing to align with the composition.

So if songwriters want to write something for you to sing, they&#039;ve gotta do it in a way that *lets you show off their song*.  Getting wrapped up in &quot;I might not sing the way they want me to&quot; is setting yourself up for failure.

And one more piece of the puzzle, though harder to gauge, is what *your audience* wants to hear.  Your audience wants to hear *you*, and not your attempt to finagle your way around someone&#039;s song.  As an example, I&#039;m often puzzled by those artists who want to &quot;cross-over&quot; to different genres of singing.  Their attempts, to me, vary from the inappropriate to the objectionable.

I&#039;ve heard you sing quite a bit.  And when you sing &quot;too high because of [your] training&quot;, I like it.  I think your high range is a *great sound*.  I always love it when you open up and sing in your high range towards the end of a number - I say to myself, &quot;There&#039;s Nancy&#039;s *real* voice!&quot;  Why would you deprive your audience of your *real* voice, and torture yourself trying to conform to someone else&#039;s idea of how you &quot;should&quot; sing a song?

Your voice is your voice, period.  If some song can&#039;t be changed to show off your voice (changing the key or the &#039;feel&#039;), then *pick a different song* - you &amp; I know there are lots of songs out there, or yet-to-be-written combinations of the 12 semitones of Western music with English words, that are or will be perfectly wonderful for you to sing.

Dana &amp; I send our love &amp; best wishes to you.  We miss you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I can&#8217;t let this one go by.  As a singer (much more so than an instrumentalist would), you have a sound, *your* sound, and more particularly, *your wonderful* sound.  If someone wants to write something for *you* to sing, then that song needs to respect your wonderful sound.  None of this claptrap about your being &#8220;not good enough&#8221; to sing the song.  Whoever writes the song should be talented enough to create a song tailored to *your* gifts.</p>
<p>In the classical music world, concerti and arias are often written with a particular performer in mind &#8211; and, if a composer writes a work for a performer, that performer is not expected to shoehorn their way of playing or singing to align with the composition.</p>
<p>So if songwriters want to write something for you to sing, they&#8217;ve gotta do it in a way that *lets you show off their song*.  Getting wrapped up in &#8220;I might not sing the way they want me to&#8221; is setting yourself up for failure.</p>
<p>And one more piece of the puzzle, though harder to gauge, is what *your audience* wants to hear.  Your audience wants to hear *you*, and not your attempt to finagle your way around someone&#8217;s song.  As an example, I&#8217;m often puzzled by those artists who want to &#8220;cross-over&#8221; to different genres of singing.  Their attempts, to me, vary from the inappropriate to the objectionable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard you sing quite a bit.  And when you sing &#8220;too high because of [your] training&#8221;, I like it.  I think your high range is a *great sound*.  I always love it when you open up and sing in your high range towards the end of a number &#8211; I say to myself, &#8220;There&#8217;s Nancy&#8217;s *real* voice!&#8221;  Why would you deprive your audience of your *real* voice, and torture yourself trying to conform to someone else&#8217;s idea of how you &#8220;should&#8221; sing a song?</p>
<p>Your voice is your voice, period.  If some song can&#8217;t be changed to show off your voice (changing the key or the &#8216;feel&#8217;), then *pick a different song* &#8211; you &amp; I know there are lots of songs out there, or yet-to-be-written combinations of the 12 semitones of Western music with English words, that are or will be perfectly wonderful for you to sing.</p>
<p>Dana &amp; I send our love &amp; best wishes to you.  We miss you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
